Cassandra Kuplast

English 110 H-5

Professor Miller

20th, November 2019

                                              Twenty Second Journal

For paper 3, I found my revision process to be similar in comparison to paper 2. I found the peer review to be very helpful, and I wasn’t shy about the changes that I made to my paper. In paper 1, I found that after writing my first draft, I kept it that way for most of the paper. The editing that I did was slight, and it was mostly local revisions. In paper 1, I considered the feedback that my peers gave me, but I didn’t do much with it. In paper 3, I listened to my peers and tried to implement the feedback that they gave me. I looked at my paper as a work in progress, not so much as something that was almost finished. Even when I completed what would end up being my final draft, I didn’t shy away from considering global changes that I could make to my paper.